Revert Disable direct reclaim for z_wr_* threads

[zfs.git] / module / zfs / txg.c

diff --git a/module/zfs/txg.c b/module/zfs/txg.c
index 00c1c7d..c234567 100644 (file)
--- a/module/zfs/txg.c
+++ b/module/zfs/txg.c
@@ -218,9 +218,19 @@ uint64_t
 txg_hold_open(dsl_pool_t *dp, txg_handle_t *th)
 {
        tx_state_t *tx = &dp->dp_tx;
-       tx_cpu_t *tc = &tx->tx_cpu[CPU_SEQID];
+       tx_cpu_t *tc;
        uint64_t txg;
 
+       /*
+        * It appears the processor id is simply used as a "random"
+        * number to index into the array, and there isn't any other
+        * significance to the chosen tx_cpu. Because.. Why not use
+        * the current cpu to index into the array?
+        */
+       kpreempt_disable();
+       tc = &tx->tx_cpu[CPU_SEQID];
+       kpreempt_enable();
+
        mutex_enter(&tc->tc_lock);
 
        txg = tx->tx_open_txg;
@@ -493,7 +503,7 @@ void
 txg_delay(dsl_pool_t *dp, uint64_t txg, int ticks)
 {
        tx_state_t *tx = &dp->dp_tx;
-       int timeout = ddi_get_lbolt() + ticks;
+       clock_t timeout = ddi_get_lbolt() + ticks;
 
        /* don't delay if this txg could transition to quiesing immediately */
        if (tx->tx_open_txg > txg ||
@@ -511,6 +521,8 @@ txg_delay(dsl_pool_t *dp, uint64_t txg, int ticks)
                (void) cv_timedwait(&tx->tx_quiesce_more_cv, &tx->tx_sync_lock,
                    timeout);
 
+       DMU_TX_STAT_BUMP(dmu_tx_delay);
+
        mutex_exit(&tx->tx_sync_lock);
 }