Illumos #764: panic in zfs:dbuf_sync_list

Hypothesis about what's going on here.

At some time in the past, something, i.e. dnode_reallocate()
calls one of:
dbuf_rm_spill(dn, tx);

These will do:
dbuf_rm_spill(dnode_t *dn, dmu_tx_t *tx)
dbuf_free_range(dn, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, tx)
dbuf_undirty(db, tx)

Currently dbuf_undirty can leave a spill block in dn_dirty_records[],
(it having been put there previously by dbuf_dirty) and free it.
Sometime later, dbuf_sync_list trips over this reference to free'd
(and typically reused) memory.

Also, dbuf_undirty can call dnode_clear_range with a bogus
block ID. It needs to test for DMU_SPILL_BLKID, similar to
how dnode_clear_range is called in dbuf_dirty().

References to Illumos issue and patch:
- https://www.illumos.org/issues/764
- https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/3f2366c2bb

Reviewed by: George Wilson <gwilson@zfsmail.com>
Reviewed by: Mark.Maybe@oracle.com
Reviewed by: Albert Lee <trisk@nexenta.com
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@nexenta.com>

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #340

diff --git a/module/zfs/dbuf.c b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
index e166c81..34ce2f6 100644 (file)
--- a/module/zfs/dbuf.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
  */
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright 2011 Nexenta Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
  */
 
 #include <sys/zfs_context.h>
@@ -1347,13 +1348,17 @@ dbuf_undirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
         * it, since one of the current holders may be in the
         * middle of an update.  Note that users of dbuf_undirty()
         * should not place a hold on the dbuf before the call.
+        * Also note: we can get here with a spill block, so
+        * test for that similar to how dbuf_dirty does.
         */
        if (refcount_count(&db->db_holds) > db->db_dirtycnt) {
                mutex_exit(&db->db_mtx);
                /* Make sure we don't toss this buffer at sync phase */
-               mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
-               dnode_clear_range(dn, db->db_blkid, 1, tx);
-               mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
+               if (db->db_blkid != DMU_SPILL_BLKID) {
+                       mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
+                       dnode_clear_range(dn, db->db_blkid, 1, tx);
+                       mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
+               }
                DB_DNODE_EXIT(db);
                return (0);
        }
@@ -1366,11 +1371,18 @@ dbuf_undirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 
        *drp = dr->dr_next;
 
+       /*
+        * Note that there are three places in dbuf_dirty()
+        * where this dirty record may be put on a list.
+        * Make sure to do a list_remove corresponding to
+        * every one of those list_insert calls.
+        */
        if (dr->dr_parent) {
                mutex_enter(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_mtx);
                list_remove(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_children, dr);
                mutex_exit(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_mtx);
-       } else if (db->db_level+1 == dn->dn_nlevels) {
+       } else if (db->db_blkid == DMU_SPILL_BLKID ||
+           db->db_level+1 == dn->dn_nlevels) {
                ASSERT(db->db_blkptr == NULL || db->db_parent == dn->dn_dbuf);
                mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
                list_remove(&dn->dn_dirty_records[txg & TXG_MASK], dr);